Locale : Global (English)
Create document Page
Review document
Page Added

Waste Management Development Study, Domažlice, Czech Republic

Domažlice's waste management development study was paid to Mott MacDonald as part of the grant, the Building absorption capacity. The study's objective was to map out the possibilities for improving the region's waste management in relation to the fulfilment of the waste management plan for Plzen and applicable legal regulations concerning municipal waste up to 2020.

Orange peel
Evaluating costs and benefits
Evaluating costs and benefits As part of the study we helped evaluate the technical alternatives based on the quantification of financial costs (capital and operational) plus selected socio-economic costs and benefits.

The change in the waste management could be subsequently co-funded from the Operational Programme Environment, which contains tools for supporting the development of integrated waste management systems.

The study included the following activities:

  • Data collection concerning statistics of waste production and the existing institutional arrangement (scope of the associations of municipalities, type of contractual relations, private suppliers of waste management services).
  • Summary of the requirements of main intentions concerning waste management.
  • Evaluation of the status and formulation of conclusions in the form of necessary changes in the waste management system until 2020.
  • Screening of the main and partial alternatives of the technical solution with an output in the form of a short list of alternatives for further evaluation.
  • Detailed descriptions of alternative recommendations to the technical solution (crushing and treatment line for residual mixed municipal waste, biogas station, composting plant, conveyer station, bio-waste collection, storage system and building waste handling).
  • Evaluation of the technical alternatives based on the quantification of financial costs (capital and operational) and selected socio-economic costs and benefits (ie the costs and benefits for the whole society).
  • Proposal and evaluation of the institutional solution with recommendations.
  • Overview of the recommended alternative and estimated costs of investments and operation.
icon-arrow-down-smlicon-arrow-left-lrgicon-arrow-left-smlicon-arrow-right-lrgicon-arrow-right-smlicon-arrow-up-smlicon-championsicon-closeicon-downloadicon-educationicon-emailicon-grid-viewicon-languageicon-link-toicon-list-viewicon-locationicon-login-registericon-minusicon-moreicon-phoneicon-plusicon-recently-viewedicon-searchicon hashkey-facts-corner-sashquote-underlinesocial-icon-facebooksocial-icon-googleplussocial-icon-linkedinsocial-icon-twittersocial-share-icon-facebooksocial-share-icon-facebooksocial-share-icon-googleplussocial-share-icon-googleplussocial-share-icon-instagramsocial-share-icon-instagramsocial-share-icon-linkedinsocial-share-icon-linkedinsocial-share-icon-twittersocial-share-icon-twittersocial-share-icon-youtubesocial-share-icon-youtubesina-weiboMM-Shape01-Quote-ViewsMM-Shape03-Quote-LocationsMM-Shape05-Quote-ProjectsMM-Shape12-Quote-SectorsMM-Shape13-Quote-ExpertiseMM-Shape14-Quote-About-UsMM-Shape14-Quote-Careerscheckmarkicon-expand-viewicon-apply-nowmenusphereicon-cookiesicon-legalicon-registered-companiestargetrotate-screenvideo-replay-flatvideo-replayaudio-muteaudio-play